lenzjo wrote: ↑Sat May 25, 2024 8:19 am
Indeed. I think it had directories whereas flex didn't, it was a flat file system.
Yes. When I see a Flex prompt these days it always brings back long forgotten memories. I do recall with Flex we simply grouped files by "disk", before we had the luxury of directories on later systems. But, it seemed to work perfectly okay at the time, when disks were only SD/SS 40 track capacity anyway?
lenzjo wrote: ↑Sat May 25, 2024 8:19 am
They're not 1771's by any chance? I have a couple of them. Haven't looked into it yet, but one of my CF sockets have a 40pin IDE socket and might be usable with the 1771...
They are WD1770 FDC chips. I don't recall the WD1771, I'll need to google. I do recall also the WD1772 at the time, which I recall just added stepping advancements over the WD1770, but was otherwise identical.
However, I don't think I really have any immediate plans for pressing my WD1770's into service, as the simplicity of just directly hooking up to the bus, a cheap / relatively tiny CF Card, with no moving parts, seems to win over the nostalgia. Although, there is the need for writing new drivers (over any pre-existing FDC driver code).
lenzjo wrote: ↑Sat May 25, 2024 8:19 am
To true... I seem to get less done now than when I was working and had limited time.
I hear you. So much to do around the house, and so many maker projects on the go.
And to add to that, this discussion now has me visualising a MECB I/O Card design with a CF socket and perhaps also a PS/2 keyboard interface. Adding these should complete the components I believe MECB would need for porting Flex 9 and making a standalone Flex system.
This perhaps diverges a bit beyond my initial MECB plan of mainly focusing on different CPU Cards and different Peripheral chip Cards, for the purpose of easy experimentation with different CPU and Peripheral device combinations.
But, there is certainly some appeal to perhaps also spending some time on bringing back some early self-contained disk OS system nostalgia. Hmm...